The principle to avoid talk about problem that challenge the honorability of people

The management of history and information to avoid a negative impact

Is usual to hear that some government requires to block some information in different websites and/or block and create their own versions.

These happens everywhere:
- for governments and countries in many wars there are two histories, one from the aggressor and one from the defender
- for business there are products in which the invested too much time and money and want to sell, offering their positive sides
- for personal, there are information they don't want to be showed.

Here we come back to the concept of the +association, the +association and the +project are the basement for a positive global government based on knowledge.
They are not the police, there are not the judges, so unless it has a very important impact in the survival of the WHOLE humanity, the the +association will allow every one to protect their own position.

But why?

Example of aluminum pots and the supposed problem in long term for health
We are going to talk about the harmful effects of pots of aluminum, there were very aggressive attacks to them, true or not, they didn't stop them.What really stop the, supposed harmful effects, were the creation and lower price of other pots, and the change in the manufacturing of pots of aluminum.

These means is better to invest the time and effort to attack and dishonor the aluminum pots, in creating a solution and in negotiate it positively.
Additionally we must remember that one of the principles of the +association, is to assume all the people does what they do, in the best way they can and with their best intentions.
These means if they are doing aluminum pots  harmful to the consumers in long term is because they don't have other change and they are doing their best.
If this is not true it belongs a problem for the local government, police, town halls, etc. The +association doesn't discuss the honorability of the people if it is a government, a dictator, a business manager or a normal person.

From the point of view of the +association, if these problem is detected, then the +association focus in investigation that contemplates the price, the adequacy of industrial machinery, etc.

About the information the +association post that information, instead of "the problem of ingestion of aluminum", could be "the techniques that reduces the ingestion of aluminum".
The +association is contemplating the problem that represent the ingestion of aluminum, but in solution for the industry. "The correct usage of aluminum pots" suggest the correct usage of the pot, i.e. avoid to scrub with metal sponges to avoid release of molecules from the pot, etc.

Example of a political problem.
If one country says the true or not about a war they is currently in process or happened centuries ago.
Talking about the benefits to the goal of the +project and +association:
- What sense has to put an information that will dispose negatively a group of person against the +association?
- What problem is if it is ignored in the databases of the +association for the public at their requirement?
To keep that information for members, and keep their opinions without a personal position  makes more sense, but even internally the +association and +project must restrict any opinion from them until they accept it.

For that reason is important to always keep in mind what are the goals of the +association and +project, even internally without access to the public anything that is write will reach the person you are talking about,  and act in the way of importance; the confidential archives without opinions will be stored anyway for the time these people stop challenging between them, or they die, or the problem becomes unimportant.