The formalization of the decision making: How many human lives can we lose for a improvement in our life

This can sound really cruel, but this is the reality.
Any kind of improvement in our lives, starting from the use of fire, implies a risk that cause human lives.
This is too for animal lives because improvements in human lives influecen positive and negatively in ecosystems.

One example is cars, the use of cars causes thousands of lifes around the world, the same for the use of electricity.

Why we talk about this in thsi project, and why is necessary to include as an important part of the management of the mental processing.

The reason is the society evolves in this concepts, in the past to use a car in some places you have to warn and fire a gun. Currently we don't, but in that time, it was the correct.
This implicit axiom, this implicit trues you assume always had been true, they weren't true always and that must be explicitly expressed for two reason:
1) Many problems raises because they base in different axioms.
2) Because several times they are outdate and can be improved.

Is a fact the use of advertisement in freeways, causes accidents, in that sense you can prohibit them.
In the same way you can prohibit the use of cars, because they cause accidents and cause people become fat and unhealthy.


The problem is meanwhile we don't formalize the decision making process, there are going to be a lost of huge amount of resources in discusions about problems that  never are resolved and cause frustration.
And one of the problem comes from the supposition there are perfection choices, choices that are good for everything and everyone, but this is false.

The only chance is when formalizing the decision making to understand there are not completely good or bad decision, list the good, the bad, improve them as possible; and take the best decision.

The problem of privacy is the same, the government with millions of people need mechanisms to detect earlier any kind of risk for the country, and in the other hand people needs privacy; but because there isn't an agreement and a mutual understanding both groups act as if the other is contrary to their rights and responsibilities, and instead of seraching the best option, they start an important loose of time and resource of their members in both sides, security and people.

Then what can we do?, the strategy of this project is foresight and responsibility, thsi mean foresight damages, reduce them. Be responsible, be positive, optimize the process, optimize the resource used, activate and use all your cognitive functions in a methodology when designing, use predefined methodology for every task that involves the previous concepts (i.e. for inventing), etc.