The analysis of the negative strategy of change

The negative strategy of change is not allowed for the member of the project, but let us to analyze why?
When one see something wrong, and one see negligence on something is easy to fill of anger and show and accuse  that behavior.

No matter what you see the humanity had been gone for better.
In food in most countries poor people lives like rich people lived two thousand years ago; in security poor people is not afraid that their house could be burned and their child be violated and took as slaves.
About freedom, one century ago, different kind of slavery around the world was the norm.
About violence, to cut a part of the body is seen as an abomination, but that was "normal" in some societies some centuries ago, as punishment in the law or as social practices like duels.

The continuous process of improvement
In that sense you have two choices, to see the past, and find a way and good and real reason to attack and feel anger to other people; or in the other way to dream and create a new and better reality.
You must think too, that the better reality you can create in the future, in that future could be see partially as an injustice and will be improved again. When understanding the latter, we understand we are in a continuous process of improvement, and that is important, the fact of understanding that no matter what you do, you will not do enough good to be perfect and righteous. The way we pay to employees in the future could be see as an injustice like we see the way first workers get payed in industry and as they saw slavery in that moment.

Then what is a negative change, this is ignore the other people, thay there is a reason they do that, is to ignore their needs and problems, and find a reason to accuse them; i.e. we can think in EEUU and their abuse to immigrants, we can move in the past and find and identify the people who had slaves, identify and publish names and all their evil acts, we even can identify their family nowadays, and then what do you expect?. to get their family to be punished, to be rejected and finally move that family to pay for the acts of their ancestors, what is what we can get them? what you can expect as an answer to your anger and frustration? to get them suicide themselves or be reject and throuw away from the society? where does this ends?

Maybe if you compare this with the current people and business, you can say this is different, but no, if you analyze in detail, if you put in their places in their responsibilities, you will see it is exactly the same.
And where ends the negative strategy of change?, this ends in the partial or  total destruction for those that inhibit the change, that maybe in the past was one that allowed a positive change.
But not only that, this will have a negative impact on the economy of the families and countries that leave from that industries, thsi could be better globally but usually for them not; and of course, that causes something, the negative strategy of change, causes they to understand where they will end if accept the negative strategy and do all what is in their hands, to stop them.
And at the end, as it had happened several times, the change is postponed for decades, and there is a lot of resources and donations invested in advertisement and verbal wars instead of executing the real change.

Global Warming is one of many examples, if you analyze in detail, instead of teaching and developing plans to seed trees, they invest in campaigns to demonstrate they are in the correct, even when it was clearly demonstrated previously, and that causes thousands of campaigns to seed trees and plants fail, because they don't do them correctly. They made a mistake they forgot to make what they can do, in their war to release that frustration. They make incorrect strategies, like the day of the planet, turning off the light gives the incorrect message that, that hour is enough to solve the problem, instead of pushing people to make a permanent change like changing bulbs, in a well designed strategy.

But in the other hand a positive attitude will not solve the problem, it requires a strategy, ability to redesign industries, to negotiate and make the change effective. This tools are teach to the member, to make them more ffective.

The hate and anger generate more hate and anger, the negative strategy for change, cause not to  get change, but yes to get more hate and anger. Not only for them, else too for future agent of change, that wants to change that or something similar in another area.

Negative is when you focus too much in the many other people must do and forget to do the little you can do.

For that reason is that this is a cause of expulsion of the project.
Now you got it ;)